**Post No. 500 on Unchained!** The Dictatorship of ‘Compassion’ — on the Richie Allen Show, July 4th 2024
‘The puppet-masters of the policy of replacement migration clearly want civil war in every victim nation, because they want to impose totalitarianism on the whole world.’
Terminal Compassion, Gaslit Gaga
Once a nation is successfully divided, terrible things begin to happen and, being difficult to describe for what they are, come to be ignored by people whose nature it once was to pay attention to terrible things. So it is with Ireland, where a congenital propensity towards compassion has now become a form of self-destruction in the shape of invited invasion, and sympathy for ‘hard cases’ — unwell mothers and rape victims — has prompted the soft-hearted Irish to issue an unlawful licence for the ‘legalised’ slaughter of what thus far amounts to 10,000 innocent babies per year. Not long ago, these things would have been unthinkable, now they are unmentionable, so that, clothed in euphemisms, they pass unnoticed by blinkered men and women on galloping horses. Statistics? What statistics?
Though even the statistics are safe and comforting. One death is a tragedy; 10,000 a datum. The purchased media print these details in microscopic print on page 42, bottom left-hand corner.
The nation divides into two: those who see with their old eyes and those who will not see due to partly-willed blindness. For those who continue seeing and seeking to remain in contact with their natures and nations, life becomes more and more difficult. They become exposed to name-calling, censorship, scapegoating, blackballing, cancellation and lawfare. At first they were mere ‘eccentrics’, but gradually moved through a series of appellations reflecting a diminishing tolerance for their insistence of seeing and seeking, and so they moved rapidly through the imputed conditions of ‘contariarism’, ‘vexatiousness’, and ‘conspiracism’, to become, eventually, ‘domestic terrorists’. Now they need to be mindful lest their lips move in public and it be assumed that they are praying for the souls of murdered babies.
Seen from a historical perspective, what is now most under attack is what we used to call the ‘nature’ — the natural humanity — of the indigenous population, which might also be called their capacity for compassion, which, by virtue of being untrammelled, had the potential of becoming deadly, though who could have anticipated that? Once, as children, they brought their spare pennies into school to send help to the ‘black babies’, doing without penny bars and jelly babies for the day. Now, that congenital desire to help those in need — the ‘less fortunate’ and the ‘most vulnerable’ in the words of pietistic priests and slimy politiciians — has been weaponised against them so that now it appears they cannot satisfy the compassion-inspectors until they’ve given away everything they have and all their children might ever have or be. Yet, to feel compassion for a native child, sliced to death by an abortionist’s knife, is disapproved of also, and in the end likely to land you in the same kind of trouble as objecting to your village being destroyed.
There is no formal opposition to this state of gaslit gaga, only an eccentric (‘outside the centre’) raggle-taggle band of idealists who imagine it must be possible to run a country without selling it out or killing one-sixth of its coming generation before they can see the light of day.
But to insist on saying so is regarded by the ‘authorities’ and their purchased servants and hypnotised supporters as a quasi-criminal activity. A false ethic of positivity is implanted in the population so that, as though by reflex, any criticism that strays into these areas is regarded as suspect. The plan is that this will continue long enough for the crime to be completed and the perpetrators enabled to escape.
During a break in proceedings during a public meeting during the recent election, in which I did not spare the tyrants who have destroyed our beautiful country, a man approached me and said:
‘We know what you’re against. But what are you for?’
It’s a journaliar question — one of those meaningless ankle-tapping instruments used either by outright scoundrels or by lazy hurlers-on-the-ditch who are possessed by an abiding need to hobble those who appear to be more alert or aware than themselves, probably in order to make themselves feel better in their lassitude. It’s also one of those lines the unthinking bystander tends to regard as very clever and rigorous, even when it is directed at those who exercise no political power, and though it amounts, on closer examination, to a fistful of boiled snow — a vacuous and ridiculous question, on account of, philosophically speaking, there being no difference between being ‘against’ bad things and being ‘for’ good things. In every denunciation of power abuses, there is an unspoken annunciation; in every critique, an implicit prescription. To oppose evil is to raise up The Good. The idea that we could speak at this moment about the conditions we are facing, and somehow present with a neat and complete Pollyanna prospectus for a bright new future without first acknowledging what has and is being done to our country is so fatuous as to be laughable. I laughed and said as much. He backed off instantly, as they always do, because they’re always just trying to nudge you off the ball, and never have the next play worked out in their hollow heads.
All the gaga grotesquerie we deal with — mass migration, abortion, LGBT filth and blackmail, trans rights, transgender toilets, drag queen story hours — these are contrived superficial phenomena with a bogus aura of spontaneity. The last thing they are is organic, but in their entirety choreographed and orchestrated. The deeper purpose is reflected in the escalating damage to constitutional supports and principles, the sledgehammering of protections belonging to family, parenthood, marriage and even human life itself, the undermining of nationhood and the decrying and abolition of transcendent thinking. All of it is fundamentally about power of the absolute kind, and in the long-term about making societies more amenable to the god-ambitions of the most evil people on Earth, and in the meantime the rule of local incompetents, useful idiots who could not rule in any other circumstances, but who justify their keep by implementing the new agendas, while keeping things moving in preparation for the arrival of the nouveau tyrants who for the moment remain publicity shy.
Behind the scenes are those ‘secret unknowns’ — the ‘Predator Class’, ‘Cult’ or ‘Combine’ — actors already in possession of vast power and resources, who never have to show themselves because they can rely on this constructed culture, this pseudo-reality, to deliver what they require. Their objective is to avoid humanity while overseeing the processes of enslaving it.
In this week’s conversation with Richie Allen, we touch on these themes and more besides. It is, I modestly claim, the kind of conversation we used to hear on radio many years ago, when you might pull the Wolseley, the HiAce or the Mini Minor into the hard shoulder in order to listen better. I hope you agree.
‘Replacement migration is not "democracy" or "the rule of law", but rather forced trespass on communities that people have built and, furthermore, it is total contempt for those people. And in a country like Ireland, where there was no racism before, this replacement migration is actually generating racism.’
‘Some of the replacement migrants have been coached to goad, to demoralise, and to gaslight the Irish people, treating with contempt their culture by pretending that it is nothing, or else can be synopsised and learned in five minutes’.
‘Someone has told me that the judge [at the delivery of the judgement in my recent “libel” proceedings] said something to the effect that my opposition [to abortion] was based on a very strong religious belief. I never said that. I wouldn’t say that, for this reason. Of course there are religious positions — there’s a Catholic attitude and a Protestant attitude to abortion. But for me it’s a human rights issue. It’s the most fundamental right of all: the right to life. And it seems to me that it is something that we have allowed ourselves to become bamboozled or bullied into censoring ourselves towards. So we get all these phraseologies like “reproductive health”, and so on. But it’s a dead baby. That’s a dead human being. That’s a human being who will never have a first day in school, who’ll never play a football match, who’ll never have a first date, who’ll never have a birthday party. That’s the way I think about it. That thing about statistics and people — that one person’s death is a tragedy, a million is a statistic — the same thing applies here: that we don’t actually personalise it. We do that with famines. We do it with what used to be called “The Famine”, and which is now called the genocide of the 1840s in Ireland, where for a long time people couldn’t grasp what had happened,. “Ah yeah, a million dead! Two million left. Yeah, yeah”. Bring it back to the woman at Limerick port who had to leave one of her children behind because she was sick and they wouldn’t take her on the boat, who had to abandon the child.’
To listen to the conversation, click here
(Conversation begins at 9 minutes in)
Buy John a beverage
If you are not a full subscriber but would like to support my work on Unchained with a small donation, please click on the ‘Buy John a beverage’ link above.
