URGENT MESSAGE RE: Covid-19 Vaccines — Renowned Physician Explains Why We Should Be Fearful and Vigilant in the Face of Official Bullying and Blackmail

Dr Peter McCullough has emerged as medicine’s most reasonable, moral voice. From many videos, I have chosen his best and below fill any lacunae in its stark message: C-19 is treatable; shun vaccines.

Forget Wuhan — the vaccine is the bio-weapon. . .

The video I am introducing today may be the most important you will ever watch. It is just one of many recent interviews conducted by the eminent Texan cardiologist, Dr. Peter McCullough, who has been the world’s most prominent and vocal advocate for early outpatient treatments of SARS-CoV-2/Covid-19 infections in order to prevent hospitalisation and death. The video is one hour and 45 minutes in length, but is so crammed with information about SARS-CoV-2, Covid-19 and related matters — virus, illness, symptoms, therapies, responses, vaccines and many other aspects that I would even go so far as to say that anyone who may be prepared to watch just one video that dissents from the mainstream narrative should become persuaded to watch this one. Dr McCullough holds that Covid-19, though generally harmless for the under-50s, can be dangerous for older people, especially those suffering from underlying conditions like heart disease, cancers, obesity etc. This is more or less what we already know, but he elaborates on the key to these demarcations in this video, describing how blood-clotting caused by the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein creates complications in cases where there is already depleted immune response. This risk is being ramped up by vaccines, which incorporate the spike protein. 

Not only is Dr McCullough an ‘expert’ in these matters, he has also developed a globally acclaimed and highly successful Covid treatment protocol, and both he and his elderly father have in the past year been diagnosed with Covid — and both recovered fully by following this protocol. Dr McCullough is 57. 

For those who do not immediately have time to watch the entire video, I will outline in this introduction Dr McCullough’s history, qualifications and a summary of his overall views on these crucial matters. Much, though not necessarily all, of this information is contained in the video, which at the same time elaborates on many of the details below. My aim here is to provide as comprehensive a summary as possible of what he has been saying on all these matters. But I would urge you to read the full text in addition to watching the video. No one can afford to be unaware of what Dr McCollough is saying.

Ideally I urge you to watch the video immediately, if this is remotely possible. Do not put it off any longer than is necessary. Read the rest of this introduction after you have watched it, to reinforce your understandings of the many grave points the good doctor is making. 


(The interview was conducted on May 19, 2021, by John Leake.)

If you have not the time now to watch this one, the video at the link below is less than 20 minutes in length. It covers some of the main points, in particular explaining why the vaccines are at serious risk of ‘backfiring’ on those who take them, and why pregnant women, children or those who have already had Covid should not take them.


Dr. McCullough is the most published doctor in history in his fields — cardiology and kidney-related conditions. He is a consultant cardiologist and Vice Chief of Medicine at Baylor University Medical Center in Dallas, Texas. He is a Principal Faculty in internal medicine for the Texas A & M University Health Sciences Center. He is an internationally recognized authority on the role of chronic kidney disease as a cardiovascular risk state with over 1,000 publications and over 500 citations in the US National Library of Medicine, the most published scientist in the history of his field.

His witness may be the most significant medical intervention since the beginning of the Covid saga. 

He tells us many things in clear and unequivocal terms:

- That Covid has always been a treatable disease.

- That early treatment could have saved 85% or 425,000 American lives.

- That there is no one drug that can provide a miraculous cure for Covid, but there are successful protocols, combining different drugs and vitamins, that can be used for outpatient treatment.

 - That the condition is a danger almost exclusively to people aged over 50, and age structures of countries are significant factors in variances in death rates around the globe. 

-  That there have been many unnecessary deaths as a result of policy decisions made at various levels of government.

 - That promising and proven Covid treatments are being sabotaged by government health agencies.

- That most medical practitioners wrongly believe there is no treatment for Covid apart from the vaccines, a fallacy he believes has resulted in hundreds of thousands of deaths in America alone. 

 - That fear and anxiety have led to ‘therapeutic nihilism’ in dealing with the crisis as efforts are being focused on vaccination only, while the Hippocratic Oath is buried.

- That, once it became clear that a vaccine was being developed, a global silence was imposed on any information on treatment.

- That vaccines are potential bio-weapons, especially dangerous to pregnant women and unjustifiable for administration to children.

He also believes that the silence of other doctors and medical societies regarding treatments for Covid is demonstrating a loss of compassion in medicine. He asserts that the failure of government leaders and public health experts to look at the evidence for early treatment is a dereliction of duty and a loss of ethical concern bordering on malfeasance. He says these actors have caused the needless deaths of many patients, and as such, must be held accountable to the full extent of the law.

When the Covid crisis hit, Dr. McCullough began studying the medical literature to find treatments and discovered that some of his patients who were testing positive for COVID were being sent home from the hospitals and told to wait two weeks, with no treatment options. He then began to treat his patients with current ‘off label’ drugs. Dr. McCullough became the lead author in a study published in the American Journal of MedicinePathophysiological Basis and Rationale for Early Outpatient Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Infection, listing existing already approved and available drugs that had shown success in treating Covid-19 patients. 

At that time, according to Dr. McCullough, there were over 50,000 papers on Covid in the peer-reviewed literature, and none of them dealt with how doctors were supposed to treat Covid. After its publication, the paper became the most cited study dealing with Covid, and practitioners from all over the world were contacting Dr. McCullough seeking help in treating Covid patients.

He now has 40 peer-reviewed publications on the condition and has commented extensively on the medical response to Covid in the US media. 

He published a video on YouTube to help spread the word that there were effective treatments for Covid. It soon went viral, and within a week YouTube took it down, stating that it violated the terms of their community. For the first time in such circumstances, life-saving information was being censored in the corporate media, and being removed from social media by order of the Big Tech overlords.  

Throughout 2020 and 2021, Dr. McCullough has testified concerning many aspects of the pandemic response in the US Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, the Colorado General Assembly, the New Hampshire Senate and the Texas Senate Committee on Health and Human Services.

Dr. McCullough points out the entire pandemic response has been focused on vaccinations. ‘I can tell you what happened. Around May [2020] it became known that the virus was going to be amenable to a vaccine and all efforts on treatment were dropped.’ He says the Covid ‘jab’ has already caused thousands of deaths and tens of thousands of hospitalisations, according to the US federal government’s own data. And that, he says, is just the tip of the iceberg.

Under normal circumstances, he says, 50 deaths reported to the CDC’s VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) surveillance system would result in a drug being taken off market immediately. In the case of the Covid shots, however, thousands of deaths have already been reported, and yet the mass vaccination programs continue to be pushed. In 1976, he says, the US government vaccinated 45 million people against swine flu. The entire program was cancelled after reports of just 53 deaths.

Dr McCullough was himself diagnosed with Covid-19 in May, 2021. He used the protocol of hydroxychloroquine, antibiotics, aspirin, and vitamins that he and over 20 of his colleagues had published for the early treatment of Covid-19. Because the virus replicates rapidly, McCullough recommends using a course of 200 milligrams of hydroxychloroquine twice a day for at least five days. Of all the therapies he used, McCullough believed this helped him  most during his own illness. The vitamin and supplement protocol includes three items: zinc sulfate, Vitamin D3, and Vitamin C. Dr McCullough said he doesn’t have any evidence to believe these help with avoiding contracting the illness, but believes they should be included in the early treatment protocol as supportive therapies.

After eight days, he felt well enough to go for a jog.  

‘It’s a rough illness and I can see why older adults are worried,’ McCullough told The Texan. ‘I am strongly encouraging early home treatment for anyone over 50 who has underlying health conditions.’

For patients who are over 50 and/or have health risks such as underlying lung, heart, or kidney disease, diabetes, cancer, or obesity, McCullough urges treatment at the onset of symptoms to get ahead of the virus and prevent hospitalisation.

Dr McCullough also successfully treated his elderly father, a nursing home resident, when he contracted the condition earlier this year. His father did not require hospitalisation.

‘Hydroxychloroquine far and away made the biggest difference,’ McCullough said afterwards. ‘It is not a cure alone, but it makes a giant difference.’ If a patient has known heart issues involving possible risks in taking hydroxychloroquine, Dr McCullough offers ivermectin as an alternative.

He believes Texas managed to overcome the disease mainly through the use of these therapy drugs. 

He insists that people who have been infected with Covid-19 should not get the vaccine. ‘We’re at 80% herd immunity right now [in Texas] with no vaccine effect, and more people are developing Covid today,’ he noted earlier this year. ‘They’re gonna become immune. People who develop Covid have complete and durable immunity. You can’t beat natural immunity. You can’t vaccinate on top of it and make it better. There’s no scientific clinical or safety rationale for ever vaccinating a covid recovered patient. . . . The vaccine is going to have a 1% public health impact. That’s what the data says.’

Despite being inexpensive and readily available, early treatments have all been censored and suppressed in order to secure a global mass vaccination campaign. An estimated 124 million Americans are now fully vaccinated against Covid-19. As of April 30, 2021, 3,837 had died shortly after their Covid shots. That’s more than have died from all available vaccines combined from mid-1997 until the end of 2013 — a period of 15.5 years,’ Dr McCullough says. 

Dr McCullough is pro-vaccines in principle but says the Covid-19 vaccines are ’far and away the most lethal, toxic biological agent ever injected into a human body in American history’. 

The Covid project is not about the virus, he says: It’s about the vaccine. 

He believes that 50,000 Americans may have died already, directly as a result of taking the vaccine. 

‘So we have actually had more deaths due to the vaccine per day than certainly the viral illness by far. It’s basically propagandized bio-terrorism by injection.’

‘This is what Globalists have been waiting for. They’ve been waiting for a way of marking people. That if you get the vaccine, you’re marked in a database. And this can be used for trade, for commerce, for behavior modification  — all different purposes.’

He says pregnant women, women of child-bearing years, children or healthy people under 50 should definitively not get the Covid ‘jab’.

He says he can no longer recommend the Covid vaccines in conscience to pregnant women of any age. The evidence of injuries and deaths is overwhelming, and deliberately understated by the media.

A recent interview with Dr McCullough on Tucker Carlson’s show on Fox News was prompted by Dr McCullough’s testimony to the Texas State Senate when he pointed out that such is the focus on the Covid-19 vaccine that the average person thinks there’s no treatment, that extraordinarily there’s been no focus on the sick or helping them, no treatment protocols or lists of centres that actually treat patients with Covid-19.

He told Carlson: ‘I’m an internist and cardiologist, trained epidemiologist. I’m not a virologist, but I handle simple things like asthma, pneumonia, upper respiratory tract infections. And we were communicating with the Italians. And we said, ‘What is going on?’ And they said, listen, this is like a cold, except the immune system goes crazy in the middle part of it and then there’s blood clotting and thrombosis.’

TC: ‘And that’s what can kill you.’

P McC: ‘That’s what kills you. So we take an edge off the viral replication early. We treat the immune system dyseregulation and then we manage the blood clotting and we can get people through the illness.’

The Fox News interview then switched to discussion of vaccines.

‘The FDA, Pfizer, Moderna, J&J, AstraZeneca,’ Dr McCullough explained, ‘strictly excluded Covid-recovered, suspected Covid-recovered, those with antibodies, pregnant women, women of childbearing potential who couldn’t assure contraception. That is a huge group of exclusions.’

He went on: ‘We’ve had 111 million people in the world who’ve gotten this infection. If there was a chance for double and triple infections in the same person, we would have seen it by the millions. If you look in the literature, maybe you can find a hundred cases where someone says “Maybe I got reinfected.” Almost always it’s a misinterpretation of one of these PCR tests which is commonly false positive. One of the false narratives out there is that you can get the infection twice. It’s a false narrative. The FDA and the sponsors knew that. Of course they excluded Covid-recovered patients. They know you can’t get it again.’

‘The Covid patients who recover, they have antibodies, they have T-cell protection, and robust immunity. The antibodies are a pretty nice indication that you’re protected, but these T-cell tests are terrific. These T-cell direct tests, that’s actually next-generation sequencing. That’s your microbiologic evidence of permanent protection.’

There is, he alleges, a systematic official cover-up of vaccine deaths. In an article written several weeks after the interview with John Leake, Dr McCullough observed:

 ‘In America, the Center for Disease Control has logged more grim milestones as of June 4, 2021, with 329,021 certified serious safety reports including 5,888 deaths and 19,597 hospitalizations. While the CDC has stated twice on their website that none of the deaths were caused by the vaccine, without external unbiased safety mechanisms including critical event committee, data safety monitoring board, and human ethics board, interpretation of the CDC causality claim can only be made in the context of semantics. 

‘Since the majority of the deaths occur within a few days of the vaccine administration, if the vaccine did not directly “cause” the death, it was undoubtedly in the causal pathway of these temporally related fatalities. 

‘Common narratives include vaccine-induced fatal heart attacks, strokes, blood clots, and blood disorders. So, one could diagnose such a scenario as follows: The patient died of myocarditis, and the myocarditis was caused by the vaccine. So the CDC can say the vaccine did not cause the death, but it was obviously in the causal pathway to death.

‘Another way to argue the case is that if the patient would have declined the vaccine, then he or she would be alive today. Sadly, this is probably the case in 5,888 Americans that have died and confirmed by the CDC, and possibly tens of thousands not reported or still backlogged at the CDC.’

On the Tucker Carlson show, he said:

‘We’re not against vaccines. I had published an oped last summer in The Hill and the title of it was The Great Gamble of the Covid-19 Vaccine Development Programme. And the point of that paper was: We are putting all of our eggs in one basket. And it was pretty clear, all of our intellectual eggs, we’re going to stake everything on American and worldwide ingenuity, working together with the World Health Organisation, Operation Warp Speed, Gates Foundation, all the regulatory agencies for a mass vaccination programme for the world. It was a stake that was taken. And it’s . . . you saw the tenor of this: needles in all the arms, army trucks rolling out with men with refrigerated vaccines. And, you know, ‘Get a needle into every arm.’ What I’ve been saying is that, ‘Listen, that’s terrific. But we ought to have a tenor of safety, safety, safety.’ If we’re going to put out a vaccine and we’re going to say we’re going to vaccinate the world, we’d better be hawks on safety —  independent data safety and monitoring boards. We’d better be looking at every event being reported into these safety databases and assure America that the programme is safe.’

Later, Tucker Carson asks him: ‘If someone comes to the physician, to the emergency room and says, “I can’t breathe”, but you don’t think he needs to be hospitalised, you tell the doctor, “Don’t treat him”. Why would you tell a doctor that?’ 

P McC: ‘The innocent explanation is it’s driven out of fear. And the fear is, you know, we don’t know how to deal with this. We don’t have large clinical trials. We don’t have the intellectual support to support our groupthink. And then because of this, we are going to err on the side of doing nothing, almost as if we’re dealing with some type of contagion that you’d read in a Michael Crichton book. It could have been all fear-driven. But I have to tell you, as a doctor, that’s not in my moral DNA to let people die with no treatment. Of course, I’m going to try some steroids or some ivermectin, or hydroxychloroquine. I’m going to add Lovenox and some other drugs. Of course I am. And sure enough, myself and others found out over time we can get people through the illness.’

Later, Tucker asks: ‘For the individuals who know it’s there and have physicians who understand their options, to just letting you die or get intubated. But you’re also describing a society whose biggest institutions are not capable of doing science any more. I mean, that’s what you . . . that’s the story you just told — science being the honest evaluation of reality and the retesting of one’s assumption. I mean, that’s science, correct?’

P McC: ‘It’s correct. And Tucker, it’s worldwide. Something is up. Listen to this. Queensland, Australia, you’ve probably been there. April, they put on the books as a law, as a law, if a doctor attempts to help a patient with Covid-19 with hydroxychloroquine, that doctor will be put in jail for six months.’

TC: ‘What?’

P McC: ‘Yes, in April, they put it on the books.’

TC: ‘Why?’

P McC: ‘Something is up. If you look at the TGA, let’s not, let’s not fry the US agencies. Let’s look at the TGA [Therapeutic Goods Administration], the FDA equivalent in Australia. And Australia is interesting, they’ve been kind of spared of Covid-19, they’ve been in these draconian lockdowns, they have this huge, susceptible population. They’re all distributed. They’ve been in fear for fourteen months. The TGA has some guidelines for Covid-19. It must have two dozen recommendations: don’t use hydroxychloroquine, don’t use ivermectin, don’t use steroids, don’t use anticoagulants, don’t use . . . They list everything you should not do. It’s like, “What should you do?” Net answer: nothing.’

TC: ‘But okay. So Covid-19 became known to the West in January of 2020. So that was one year and four months ago. Okay, so how could, with such a short period of time, the health regulators of Australia know to the point where they codified it in a regulation that hydroxychloroquine is not an effective therapy against Covid-19, like, how could that be known? It couldn’t be known, correct?’

P McC: ‘It couldn’t be known. And in fact, there are pieces of the timeline that are suggesting that something is very wrong going on in the world. And whatever’s going on, it is worldwide. It is not just US. Things are worse in Canada. There are anguishing doctors and nurses in northern EU and in Scandinavia about euthanasia and having the seniors literally just be euthanised. There’s some horrible things going on.’

TC: ‘You’re completely blowing my mind. I didn’t expect this interview at all. I saw your testimony. I thought you asked a really interesting question. I wanted to hear more about it. I did not expect this. This is really shocking. And by the way, for viewers who are wondering who is this guy? Is he just some random guy who is claiming to be a doctor? Look him up, Peter McCullough, and I think you’ll be quite satisfied after your Google search that you have the authority to say the things that you’re saying.’

P McC: ‘I testified under oath. I have 600 publications in the peer-reviewed literature. I’m the president of a major medical society, I’m the editor of two major journals. I’ve headed up 24 data safety monitoring boards in major drug trials and stopped drug trials early for safety reasons. I’m telling you, I have no agenda, but I am deeply concerned that something has gone off the rails in the world. It involves science. It involves the medical literature. It involves the regulatory response, it involves populations kept in fear and in isolation and despair.’

TC: ‘You’ve alluded a couple of times to “something being up”, I think is the phrase that you used. Can you, can you put a slightly finer point on that? Do you believe that NGOs, the enormous non-profits that have a lot of sway, it seems like, in the public health arena, are exercising influence over Covid policy in the direction that you’re describing? Is it that? Is that some international regulatory body, is it WHO? I mean, what is this? Do you think?’

P McC: ‘That’s really going to be the goal of investigative reporters to figure this out. There must be stakeholders, or there must be some fundamental drivers for a groupthink. Now, this is a groupthink, it’s in the minds of people.’

TC: ‘Is anyone profiting from it?

P McC: ‘I have no idea. And it’s just . . . I’m just focusing on the sick patient right in front of me, Tucker. I can’t tell you, but I have seen things in the last year that I can’t explain as a doctor. Why are other doctors not helping with a simple illness to help these patients avoid hospitalisation and death? Why are they not doing this? There are cases, there’s been three cases in New York where there have been some seniors and they’re struggling in the hospital, and the families find out about ivermectin, a simple drug that’s used in the early outpatient realm to reduce viral replication. It’s an anti-parasitic drug, very safe and effective. And they beg the doctors in the hospital, three cases, and the doctors say, “No, we’re not going to use it.” And they say, “Listen, why not give it a shot?” “No.” They go to a court, they get a court order. And the judge says, “Listen to the family and give them some ivermectin.” And those three cases, the seniors survive. There’s two cases going on right now. There’s one in Chicago going on right now, where they even come with a court order and the doctors say, “No, I’m not going to do it, we’re not going to give it.” And then they . . . they had to somehow enforce the court order to give this poor lady some ivermectin. And they were asking my advice. I said, “I think it’s too late. I’m not sure she’s going to make it, but let’s try to give it a shot.” There’s another one going on in Detroit. There’s something in the minds of doctors.’

TC:  ‘What are they afraid of? I mean, getting fired would be my first guess. They work for a hospital or a university that won’t tolerate dissent, I guess. I don’t know. Is this . . . is this an analogue to what we’re seeing in the political sphere, where no one’s allowed to deviate from a certain orthodoxy or else they get bounced? Is that kind of what it is?’

P McC: ‘That’s a tractable explanation. There is great fear, I think, in the academic medical centres, medical groups and others to do anything that’s not in line with the general approach that’s been laid out by our public health officials. Now, it’s more severe in countries outside the United States. So, for instance, in Canada, the UK, for instance. I was interviewed the other day by somebody, it was a little slip that came out which was interesting. He said, “Well, Dr McCullough, what do you think about the most recent ruling from the CDC?” I said, “Ruling? Are they the Supreme Court?” . . . “Ruling” —  but that’s in the minds of people. So our public health authorities with more than a year of public fear of what’s next, our public health authorities have really become larger than life in terms of their ability to create an environment of loss of freedom.’

Later in the interview, returning to the specific question of  vaccines. Dr McCullough raises the principle of autonomy, as set down in the Nuremberg Code:

‘This is very important. It’s written into the Nuremberg Code, but we live by it every day. It says the person, the individual, gets to decide what happens to their body — they can take advice, but what happens to their body, without pressure, coercion or threat of reprisal? This is really important. The Nuremberg Code came out of World War Two where there were atrocities going on. And as we moved forward in research, we wanted to learn from this Nazi research, which was . . . which was awful. We had a terrible situation in the United States, the Tuskegee experiments, where, for research, people ought to have informed consent and they can freely participate or not. And we . . . we follow that in clinical medicine. This is really, really important. If a Jehovah’s Witness says, “Listen, I’m not taking a blood transfusion,” I can’t force it into their body. If we have a patient who says, “Doctor, I’m not taking a vaccine,” we cannot . . . Without pressure, coercion or reprisal — we can’t have somebody say, “Listen, I’m going to lose my job.” That’s pretty strong coercion, don’t you think? How about, “I can’t go to school. I can’t . . . I can’t get my college degree”?

TC: ‘Your children can’t be educated if you don’t obey. So I think that’s a point that all decent people have considered at some point in the last week or two, as we’re learning that coercion is real and that you will be punished unless you obey. My question to you, though, as a physician is: that is in direct contradiction of the Nuremberg Code. Is that something that all physicians are familiar with?’

P McC: ‘Yes.’

TC: ‘ So why are they standing back and allowing this to happen?’

P McC: ‘The groupthink is extraordinary. You know, there’s some doctors that have told patients, “I’m not going to see these patients unless they’re vaccinated. They can’t go into my waiting room unless they’re vaccinated.” You know, there’s a hospital in Houston, Texas, that came out and said, “Listen, if people don’t succumb and take the vaccine that . . .” for months they said, “Listen, in order to encourage you, we’ll pay you $500.” If I tried to do that in a research study, the investigation review board wouldn’t agree with that. That’s coercive. $50 is coercion to low income workers, but it still didn’t convince them. The workers were, you know, looking at the safety and saying, “You know, I think I’m going to hold back.” Then they came out a week or so ago and said, “Listen, if you don’t take the vaccine, we’re going to fire you.” And then the workers got together and said, “You know, some of us don’t want to, can’t take it.” And they said, “You’re fired.” And some employees started getting fired.

Later in the interview: 

TC. ‘I heard a doctor on CNN yesterday say, “You’re selfish if you’re worried about the risk to you, you get vaccinated for society.” Barack Obama just said that exact same thing. That’s not a precept of science, of medicine?’

P McC: ‘Not in the middle of an active pandemic. Now, you could say, listen, we eradicated smallpox. All the little kids, we vaccinate then because we haven’t eradicated a disease, so we’re always protecting that person, but we’re protecting everybody else, not to have smallpox come back. But when this is basically wide open, 45,000 cases a day, this isn’t . . . this isn’t eradicated. The purpose of vaccination now — and I recommended in my practice — is to protect people who, honestly, I think are going to die of Covid. So it’s going to be those vulnerable people aged over 50, medical problems. I have a couple of patients, they said, “Doc, should I take the vaccine, I’m worried.” I said, “Listen, you wouldn’t stand two hours with Covid, take the vaccine.” The vaccine is to protect the vulnerable. It’s not to just sweep through the population in the middle of a pandemic. It’s a wrong approach.’

Coming to the end of the Fox News interview, Tucker Carlson said: ‘Man! Dr Peter McCullough, one of the most upsetting conversations I have had in a long time, but much needed, thank you very much. I really appreciate it.’

At the end of the Leake interview (below again):

Dr McCullough is asked if any agency or individual has tried to silence him through threats or intimidation, to which he replies:

‘My personal situation, professional situation, is a position of strength.

‘And those who have attempted, in any way, to pressure, coerce, or threaten me with reprisal, have paid an extraordinary price.

‘And I think that’s an important message to get out there.

‘There is a position of strength based on principles of compassionate care, and of the Hippocratic oath, and of the fiduciary relationship that a doctor has to a patient, and a prominent doctor has to a population, that supersedes all of those other ill intents.

‘And what I say is, bring them on.’ 

I have a major favour to ask of you, my readers. If this article interests you, and you believe — as I do — that its content is of vital importance for our future and the continued wellbeing of our friends, families and other fellow humans, please share it as far and wide as is within your power. It is of the utmost importance that people be assisted in making informed decisions about what may soon become life-or-death questions, and it is clear that our profoundly corrupted media are no longer interested in facilitating — or indeed permitting — proper discussion and debate. Blow your Share button out! JW